2. . Ext4 tiene el registro en diario de forma predeterminada y es probable que los nuevos usuarios no sepan cómo deshabilitarlo para guardar lecturas / escrituras en sus. The ext4 file system is still fully supported in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 and can be selected at installation. The fastest for the SATA/USB tests was XFS followed quickly by EXT4 and then F2FS. Ext4 file system is an ideal choice. Each file system has its own advantages and disadvantages. While it is possible to migrate from ext4 to XFS, it. El ext4 y xf. BTRFS . The total throughput is better than with ZFS (40k vs 60k), but the jitter is more severe. I haven't benchmarked the performance but as a user on a modern desktop/laptop system with fast ssd, f2fs vs btrfs didn't show any. and. The most commonly used are Ext4, Btrfs, XFS, and ZFS which is the most recent file system released back in 2018. showed that at the time the performance for the RAID setup was not able to compete with ext4 and ZFS. Each of these file systems has its own way of organizing data, merits, and demerits. Thanks. 04 Disco Dingo was running on the Threadripper setup while using the Linux Git kernel from the mainline PPA. Ext3 and ext4 have some very specific differences, which I'll focus on here. In today's video, we will talk about the 4 Major Linux File Systems. 2. The total throughput is better than with ZFS (40k vs 60k), but the jitter is more severe. You will see the difference especially with autosaves in Satisfactory for an example. Pros: Individual file size: 16GB to 2TB. the mirrored pairs would be much faster for both reads and writes. Ext4 has journaling on by default, and new users likely won’t know how to disable it to save read/writes on their SSDs. Seeking around those files which a DB will do may yield different. Ext4 is built on older technology, so it lacks modern file-system features found in systems like E2FS and BtrFS. It was time to do my quarterly disaster recovery drill, which involves bootstrapping my entire system from scratch using my scripts and backups. As others have said, btrfs is newer and offers a few advanced features for backups (snapshots) and data integrity. And BRTFS has some really nice features in that area. Linux có nhiều tùy chọn hệ thống file khác nhau. 특히 시놀로지에서는 데이터 보호와 백업의 용이함을 장점으로 내세운 Btrfs를 권장합니다. EXT4 vs. It does its job well. Out of Ext4 or btrfs, I would chose btrfs with the snapshots. Mount ntfs drives only read only. Granted, i just use the automatic partition creater at setup, so it still uses ext4 for the /boot and /boot/efi partitions. 7. It's a filesystem which resides entirely in your RAM. F2FS vs. btrfs is da bomb yo. You can easily backup each distro without filling your disk using snapshots. Tuy nhiên, đối với phân vùng /home chứa các file cá nhân, openSUSE đã quyết định sử dụng hệ thống file XFS thay thế. ext4 is an "advanced" version of ext3 with various improvements, basically an upgrade to the ext3 format. ext4 파일 시스템은 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5에서 사용 가능한 기본 ext3 파일 시스템의 확장된 버전입니다. How do the major file systems supported by Linux differ from each other?The major difference between ext4 and XFS file systems is that the ext4 file system works better for fewer size files (single write/read thread) while the XFS works more efficiently for larger files (multiple read/write threads). In Summary, ZFS, by contrast with EXT4, offers nearly unlimited capacity for data and metadata storage. 0 NVMe SSD was used for the benchmarking of these file-systems in different desktop use-cases. Btrfs on SSD, XFS on HDD. It is the evolution of the most used Linux filesystems (Ext3, Ext2) and promises improved design, better performance, reliability, and features over its predecessors. Each of the tested file-systems were carried out with the default mount options in an out-of-the-box manner. Using: - A full partition in a single 1TB or 2TB NVMe SSD. As for filesystems, not sure I'd bother considering JFS since I believe it may be deprecated out of the kernel soon. ext4 with m=0 ext4 with m=0 and T=largefile4 xfs with crc=0 mounted them with: defaults,noatime defaults,noatime,discard defaults,noatime results show really no difference between first two, while plotting 4 at a time: time is around 8-9 hours. e. We recommend btrfs for testing, development, and any non-critical deployments. Either way you go, just leave EXT4 where it is, in the ground. However, when we review EXT4 vs BTRFS, here’s the downside: BTRFS has disk and volume management built-in, while EXT4 is a “pure filesystem”. installs, natively. User quotas for each shared folder. Both are good file systems. XFS, EXT4, and BTRFS are file systems commonly used in Linux-based operating systems. btrfs 可以支援 snapshot, 但 ext4 不行, 如果一開始就採用 ext4, 日後如果要使用 snapshot 功能, 必須將 NAS 的資料備份出來, 重新 format 成 btrfs 格式. EXT4 es el sistema de archivos más utilizado en sistemas operativos basados en Linux, este sistema de. FYI: btrfs. Tính năng tự khôi phục tập tin. Use XFS for your array drives and Btrfs for your cache pool. We will determine which one is the best ZFS, BTRFS, and EXT4. 3TB HDD formatted as NTFS for main files. F2FS, XFS, ext4, zfs, btrfs, ntfs, etc. This article provides a detailed comparison of XFS vs btrfs to help you determine which file system is a better fit for your use case. 1 Overview of File Systems in Linux. And you might just as well use EXT4. use ZFS only w/ ECC RAM. NTFS Benchmarks Continuing on from yesterday's Linux 4. The most commonly used are Ext4, Btrfs, XFS, and ZFS which is the most recent file system released back in 2018. Also, reducing the life of my SSD by a month is worth winning an argument from which I get absolutely no benefit. Edit: I managed to save the two NTFS HDDs with chkdsk, but the exFAT drive just didn't wanna play ball. ”. The only concern I have is performance, maybe btrfs in a HDD will be really slow. btrfs was slower and had reliability problems. also XFS has been recommended by many for MySQL/MariaDB for some time. This correlates with the previous experiment and the hypothesis. This is because BTRFS is optimized for handling small files, while EXT4 can struggle with multiple small files due to its delayed allocation of. 1. But I would still refrain from using it on the deck due to the case folding trouble. one of the still “beta” features of btrfs. ext3 is the most common format. EXT4 is functional and is considered more stable. #11. And xfs. But… Some different plus for BTRFS Backup is about data safety. Though personally I'd still go with ext4 primarily because despite recognizing some potential benefits of btrfs, I really don't see them as important for how I use my computers. So for a large video collection, I think I will stick with ext4 still. SSD Disk Observations. Also, on ZFS, in Linux, it takes some tweaking to get it performing good, so I would suggest to go btrfs or XFS. FreeBSD has ports you can install that will allow data transfer of some linux file systems. Those curious about the many changes found for the file-systems and other sub-systems within the Linux 3. Storage Manager Last updated: Apr 18, 2023 Purpose This article compares the different file systems to help you decide which one to choose when creating a. The PostgreSQL database server ran well particularly on EXT4 and XFS while F2FS on the USB 3. It supports large file systems and provides excellent scalability and reliability. September 18, 2023 Miscellaneous 9 mins read This article will look at the difference between the Btrfs vs. A Red Hat training course is available for RHEL 8. Файловая система Ext4 это улучшенная версия Ext3, которая, в свою очередь, не что иное, как переработанная Ext2. That was many years ago, perhaps when btrfs was less ready. The BTRFS RAID is not difficult at all to create or problematic, but up until now, OMV does not support BTRFS RAID creation or management through the webGUI, so you have to use the terminal. 0 SSD drive used was a 250GB Samsung 850 PRO solid-state drive connected both via SATA and then a SATA. From what I read. Ext4 provides more flexibility in terms of data storage. Modern Linux filesystems, such as ext4, Btrfs and JFS, do store the file creation time (aka birth time), but use different names for the field in question (crtime in ext4, otime in Btrfs and JFS). Here is a look at the Linux 5. EXT3 이후 나온 EXT4는 기존 버전보다 안정성은 향상이 되었지만 범용성과. With Btrfs you get self healing, snapshots, copy on write, background file system checks, online defragmentation, and much more. Though EXT4 has few strong capabilities, it is reliable and well-maintained across all Linux operating systems. EXT4와 Btrfs는 서로 다른 유형의 문제를 해결하도록 설계되었습니다. I suggest to give the arch wiki a read to get an overview what btrfs provides and where it’s limited in comparison to other solutions. Reviews of EXT4, EXT3, XFS, BTRFS, and ZFS. Backups and CoW, are why I use btrfs. For example, my virtualization server is currently hyper-v and I use ReFS instead of NTFS for features like bitrot protection, checksums, ect. Business, Economics, and Finance. XFS is optimized for large file transfers and parallel I/O operations, while ext4 is optimized for general-purpose use with a focus on security. XFS. Between 2T and 4T on a single disk, any of these would probably have similar performance. I've compiled in tmpfs for over a decade now. are two different decisions you have to make. EXT4. Provides good performance for many enterprise work load, and probably some desktop ones too. For example btrfs supports transparent file compression. zfs or btrfs or ext4. Across the three tested RAID modes, EXT4 was performing the worst. EXT4 being the “safer” choice of the two, it is by the most commonly used FS in linux based systems, and most applications are developed and tested on EXT4. Ext4 has some scalability and performance issues when dealing with large or fragmented files or directories. After much reading on ReFS, Btrfs, & ZFS, I've decided to run all 3 🤷♂️(Did the same with Seagate vs. Tích hợp Cloud Station Server, Drive mang hiệu quả cao. Installing and booting with BTRFS has its advantages too. Ext4 comes up with some new and improved features such as: Extent-based. Let's go over File Systems in this video. User quotas for each shared folder. Backups and CoW, are why I use btrfs. Use xfs_info to verify that the ftype option is set to 1. 84 nvme drives split up into a small ext4 volume and the rest is btrfs. Snapraid says if the disk size is below 16TB there are no limitations, if above 16TB the parity drive has to be XFS because the parity is a single file and EXT4 has a file size limit of 16TB. If you do hardware RAID, with a dedicated RAID card, just do not use ZFS please, it will break your data at some point. use ZFS only w/ ECC RAM. Ext4 file systems. 0 File-System. The main thing is to use latest Linux kernels to avoid old kernel Btrfs implementation. What we mean is that we need something like resize2fs (ext4) for enlarge or shrunk on the fly, and not required to use another filesystem to store the dump for the resizing. /boot/efi has to be FAT32 (assuming you are using it as the ESP and not just adding partitions extra partitions under /boot to test how robust the boot sequence is). , a really large number of processes all writing to the filesystem at once). Out of curiosity I have tried BTRFS (still unstable so I can't really expect to be able to use it) and noticed that the read speed is about 150% of ext4 - while write speed is comparable. Ext4: cũng giống như Ext3, lưu giữ được những ưu điểm và tính tương thích ngược với phiên bản trước đó. 数据场和大存储池会揭示关于 ext4、XCF 以及 btrfs 不同的场. Which is better largely depends on opinion. I am getting too many input/output errors with my 3TB HDD NTFS hard disk for main files. That bug apart, any delayed allocation filesystem (ext4 and btrfs included) will lose a significant number or un-synched data in case of uncontrolled poweroff. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and. Potential for data loss: While btrfs has features to protect against data loss, these features can be complex to configure and may not always work as intended, leading to the possibility of data loss. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. For BTRFS, the overall throughput is fairly low (~30k tps), while the jitter is somewhat better and worse than for EXT4/XFS at the same time. The four hard drives used for testing were 6TB Seagate IronWolf NAS (ST6000VN0033. And ext3. ZFS also has more options for caches and such things than EXT4. You can hot swap drives without rebooting, remove failed drives, swap in a larger drive and remove the smaller one, all without preparing ahead of time to do so. btrfs sub cr /mnt/@ (the @ alone is the convention for "root directory" in btrfs) btrfs sub cr /mnt/@home. So now I can boot up into a snapshot. Ability to create large volumes of up to 1 PB 1. Tl;dr: The best filesystem for Unraid. There are results for “single file” with O_DIRECT case (sysbench fileio 16 KiB blocksize random write workload): ext4 1 thread: 87 MiB/sec. XFS is about as mainline as a non-ext filesystem gets under Linux. . ZFS isn't native to Linux, nor is it GPL compatible, but it works fairly well and is a stable file system. I see that it says multiple btrfs snapshots are not supported. Various benchmarks have concluded that the actual ext4 file system can perform a variety of read-write operations faster than an NTFS partition. Mount the partition and test the conversion by checking the files. As others have said, btrfs is newer and offers a few advanced features for backups (snapshots) and data integrity. btrfs 当然值得尝试、但要在桌面 Linux 上完全取代 ext4 可能还需要一些时间。. 4. 3TB HDD formatted as NTFS for main files. I've never had an issue with either, and currently run btrfs + luks. btrfs has the "btrfs-balance" command. g. Approach 1: Build your own kernel, and tweak it's build config to pre-link btrfs. Ext4 seems better suited for lower-spec configurations although it will work just fine on faster ones as well, and performance-wise still better than btrfs in most cases. Agree, actually I have a bunch of freebsd for ZFS. repeat with all candidate filesystems in my case it was ext3, XFS, ReiserFS and JFS. Data Colossi & Data Centers: Ext4 is non-negotiable for handling extensive data transactions. ago. Linux provides the statx(2) system call interface for retrieving the file birth time for filesystems that support it since kernel version 4. EXT4 had the best speed at 58MB/s while Btrfs came in slightly behind that at 52MB/s and then ZFS came in at 46MB/s. Btrfs（技术预览）" 6. For zfs there is a plugin. We may have lengthy talk on ext vs XFS vs f2fs and btrfs vs zfs and there are many more points to be mentioned, but for regular users. The way you describe this workload, I think it is not very demanding. Compared to ext4, XFS has unlimited inode allocation, advanced allocation hinting (if you need it) and, in recent version, reflink support (but they need to be explicitly enabled in. Same as with ZFS. Multimedia Sanctuaries: With large files as daily bread, ext4 is indispensable. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. Support for large file sizes - The Ext4 supports a single file size of up to 16 TiB ( Tebibytes ) whereas XFS supports a max file size of up to 8 exbibytes. Hi there, I‘m thinking of changing my filesystem from ext4 to btrfs, as I have read a lot of positive things about it online. #6. Journaling ensures file system integrity after system crashes (for example, due to power outages) by keeping a record of file system. Data integrity protection. BTRFS also had somewhat higher latency than EXT4, meaning that it took longer for files to be accessed on the file system. So it has no barring. Btrfs is the recommended file system to use in most scenarios. Optane SSD RAID Performance With ZFS On Linux, EXT4, XFS, Btrfs, F2FS Storage : 2019-06-20: FreeBSD ZFS vs. Both Btrfs and Ext4 have their own advantages. ran defragment utility to compress all existing files. Page 2 of 2. We currently recommend XFS for production deployments. The most commonly used are Ext4, Btrfs, XFS, and ZFS which is the most recent file system released back in 2018. 其實你提到一個重點了. , not available on the GUI for now) that allows choosing a file system from a white list, defaulting to ext4. EXT4 vs. Per the recommendation from RedHat: Another way to characterize this is that the Ext4 file system variants tend to perform better on systems that have limited I/O capability. 3. And the I discovered how many tools are out there to recover data from EXT partitions and how few for XFS. ago. I had no bad experience myself with btrfs so far, but still have not tried it with anything more complex than raid1 over a long time and while I assume many horror stories out there are just deprecated as btrfs keeps improving, it can do a lot more than ext4. Linux EXT4/Btrfs RAID With Twenty SSDs Storage :. Una vez que hemos conocido las principales características de EXT4, vamos a hablar sobre Btrfs, el que se conoce como sucesor natural del sistema de archivos EXT4. Bitrot is possible, but would be extremely rare, same as bit flipping. I was using NTFS due to compatibility. The thing is I'm putting /home in a separate HDD. This article provides a detailed comparison of the three file systems to help you decide which one is the best for your needs. Btrfs and Ext4 are Linux file systems but are. It is backward-compatible with older versions of Ext. Both are suitable for everyday use, but it's worth noting that ext4 partitions. BTRFS has (by far) the better ecosystem of tools and utilities. The stock mount options were used for all of the testing. Btrfs Benchmarks comparison, here is a wider look at mainline file-systems on the Linux 4. From some of the recent Linux kernel patches, it seems some of the most popular Linux file systems, Flash-Friendly File System (F2FS), B-Tree Filesystem (Btrfs), and fourth extended filesystem. 和 ext4 和 XFS 一起使用的工具比较 法律通告 Settings Close. En el caso de los servidores NAS de Synology, tenemos la posibilidad de configurar EXT4 o Btrfs, de hecho, en el asistente de configuración de los volúmenes podremos elegir entre uno y otro sin ningún problema. 8 snapshot as of last week. Linux 5. On the other hand, for Linux/Unix-based devices, it might be a bit of a challenge choosing one among many options. Ext4文件系统是Ext3的继承者，是Linux下的主流文件系统。经过多年的发展，它是目前最稳定的文件系统之一。但是，老实说，与其他Linux文件系统相比，它并不是最好的Linux文件系统。 在XFS vs Ext4方面，XFS在以下几个方面优. Currently I'm running on LVM with SSD caching and ext4 fs. It supports large file systems and provides excellent scalability and reliability. • 3 mo. Như vậy, chúng ta có thể dễ dàng kết hợp các phân vùng định dạng Ext2, Ext3 và Ext4 trong cùng 1 ổ đĩa trong Ubuntu để tăng hiệu suất hoạt động. In my second round I made setups with btrfs on the nvme SSD and luks+btrfs on 2TB HDD as RAID1. I understand if I use zfs/btrfs i will miss out on any data redundancy features but maybe pick up some added features like better consistency, snapshots, ect or should I just stick with ext4. Although XFS is good, in practice I've found ext4 to be slightly faster. XFS is very well established and changing slowly, and the same can be said for EXT4. Allerdings hatte BTRFS eine deutlich bessere Leistung bei kleinen Dateien als EXT4. We may have lengthy talk on ext vs XFS vs f2fs and btrfs vs zfs and there are many more points to be mentioned, but for regular users. There’s very little difference between EXT4 and XFS, both in total throughput and behavior over time. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. Btrfs vs Ext4. The XFS File System. Two subvolumes, root and home, are created from that pool and mounted at / and /home respectively. File Size: Ext4 supports file size up to 16 TiB, while Btrfs. 這裡有 4 個關於 EXT4 和 Btrfs 的附加問題。在這裡查看答案。 1. Ext4 Filesystem 其實你提到一個重點了. There was obviously some caching / lack of committing to disk involved that led to faster performance while the Btrfs file-system was in line with real-world expectations out of the. Ceph's recommendation for the choice of filesystem is between btrfs and XFS. No compression, but compaction. It was also during a power outage, and yes I should have had that. 14 stable and Linux 3. BTRFS. The 3TB HDD are ext4. F2FS vs. It's rigid and inflexible. A maximum partition size of the btrfs file system is 16 exbibytes, as well as maximum file size is 16 exbibytes too. but for the shared servers with many users you might consider xfs for the parallel IO and number of files. Dropping performance in case with 4 threads for ext4 is a signal that there still are contention issues. All of these Linux. - no encryption. 4. 再將資料再回存到 NAS, 這部份會花費很多時間. Bcachefs is the file-system born out of the Linux kernel's block cache code and has been worked on the past several years by. Linux 5. Here are some key differences between them: XFS is a high-performance file system that Silicon Graphics originally developed. Windows users don’t have much of a choice regarding a file system. I've heard good things about BTRFS, and I'd use XFS but I dislike that it takes an significant % of the free-space off the bat. In a few words, I just need a really reliable and fast filesystem for years ahead, with the care of SSD in mind, I need it mostly for gaming, video-audio production, working with a lot of small/medium files (from 100-500Kb to 100-150Gb) sending them. But btrfs is not by any stretch the default Linux file system. Language: Format: Red Hat Training. Not only does both file systems feature a more robust data assurances then XFS (the mature fsck for Ext4 and checksums and data. WD & Windows vs. The btrfs backup multi-disk arrangement, of different disk sizes in single mode was for me a trial of btrfs. 0 Intel Skylake 16384MB Samsung SSD 950 PRO 256GB LLVMpipe Realtek ALC1150 Intel Connection Ubuntu 16. Regarding boot drives : Use enterprise grade SSDs, do not use low budget commercial grade equipment. This pre-dates xfsprogs 3. But they come with the smallest set of features compared to newer filesystems. XFS与Ext4性能比较. XFS as a similar featureset filesystem manages around 99. xfs command. 2. On a single-drive system, performance wise ext4 is what the user wants. Như vậy, chúng ta có thể dễ dàng kết hợp các phân vùng định dạng Ext2, Ext3 và Ext4 trong cùng 1 ổ đĩa trong Ubuntu để tăng hiệu suất hoạt động. This page is powered by a knowledgeable community that helps you make an informed decision. They perform differently for some specific workloads like creating or deleting tenthousands of files / folders. Various internet sources suggest that XFS is faster and better, but taking into account that they also suggest that EXT4 is. It has features that can scale better than ext4 and is even preferred over ZFS by some users. BTRFS VS EXT4 performance in Raid 1. F2FS vs. というのをベースにするとXFSが良い。 一般的にlinuxのブロックサイズは4kなので、xfsのほうが良さそう。 MySQLでページサイズ大きめならext4でもよい。xfsだとブロックサイズが大きくなるにつれて遅くなってる傾向が見える。 Ext4 is the default file system on most Linux distributions for a reason. Ext4, while. 240GB SSD formatted as EXT4 for main OS. Data Colossi & Data Centers: Ext4 is non-negotiable for handling extensive data transactions. Linux 5. Windows users don’t have much of a choice regarding a file system. Additional mount points using Btrfs will also have corresponding subvolumes created based on the Name field. wbeater • 3 yr. BTRFS VS EXT4 performance in Raid 1. Even if you do notice. ZFS ain't bad, but this whole btrfs data loss myth needs to stop. It was later developed for Linux. With not having the time to conduct the usual kernel version vs. . Tính năng sao chép dữ liệu. Use XFS for your array drives and Btrfs for your cache pool. For these reasons, Fedora has made BTRFS the standard filesystem in their newer releases. Although both ext4 and XFS are excellent at what they do, neither are suited to some of today’s more complex storage challenges. I understand that btrfs have a major problem with Raid, - and that is a problem. NTFS. For the Proxmox host, if you install it and use LVM-thin as root pool option in the Proxmox installer, it will automatically make a root partition in EXT4. EXT4 still performs better than BTRFS. EXT4 vs. Personally I run btrfs on all my Linux devices, some of them with half-decade old installations of Arch and they've all performed admirably. The only benefit of btrfs that I could find was marginally easier setup and the software license. Worthy mentions on the functionality front include: Copy-on-write: Btrfs uses copy-on-write to create system snapshots without duplicating data and wasting space. Usable space isn't a big issue but I don't want to lose half with RAID 10. Generally, would go with btrfs. It utilizes a b+tree structure instead of the traditional linear layout found in most filesystems today, allowing it to better manage larger datasets more efficiently than other systems like ext4 or Xfs. could go with btrfs even though it's still in beta and not recommended for production yet. The only realistic benchmark is the one done on a real application in real conditions. Phoronix: Linux 5. For the adventurous: you can define block devices on btrfs and use ext4 on those block devices (ext4 on btrfs). Interestingly, the first version of the Ext4 filesystem, the Extended filesystem (“Ext”), came out in 1992 for the Minix OS. Does that mean that if I'm using btrfs snapshots, it will not save parity data for any snapshots other than the current state of the drive, that it will only save parity data for one snapshot other than the current state of the drive, or that it will fail entirely?ZFS can also send and receive file system snapshots, a process which allows users to optimize their disk space. XFS still has some reliability issues, but could be good for a large data store where speed matters but rare data loss (e. Btrfs come with compression algorithms present in the filesystem, allowing data to be compressed at the filesystem level right when written to the system. Die Funktionen umfassen eine transparente Komprimierung, Prüfsummen und. BTRFS hatte auch etwas höhere Latenz als EXT4, was bedeutet, dass es länger dauerte, bis Dateien auf dem Dateisystem zugegriffen werden konnten. 1. The major difference between ext4 and XFS file systems is that the ext4 file system works better for fewer size files (single write/read thread) while the XFS works more efficiently for larger files (multiple read/write threads). But timeshift reports (maybe due to different sizes of the combined btrfs) as reported in my initial. XFS File System Support for large file sizes - The Ext4 supports a single file size of up to 16 TiB ( Tebibytes ) whereas XFS supports a max file size of up to 8 exbibytes. Both filesystems provide COW but XFS fragments less (and it's data cow only so no snapshots, only reflinks). Its not faster or more stable then the other two. Ext4 is kind of the "tried and true" old file system that works and has good performance, but lacks many modern features, like snapshots, subvolumes, etc. To mount the XFS file system so that it uses the external journal, specify the -o logdev=device option to the. Btrfs (pronounced as Butter FS, Better FS, or B-Tree FS) Considering that the btrfs will be able for spanning over the multiple hard drives, it is a very good poit that it can support 16 times more drive space than the ext4. F2FS With Linux 4. . 3. Thanks! In that case, your choice is simple. Ext4 has some scalability and performance issues when dealing with large or fragmented files or directories. However, when we review EXT4 vs BTRFS, here’s the downside: BTRFS has disk and volume management built-in, while EXT4 is a “pure filesystem”. On the other hand, backup of xfs to xfs allows you certain features that. Another point against btrfs is the insane amount of memory it uses. It can store large files and has advanced features as compared to Ext2 and Ext3. Yes Ext4 is much easier to setup but BTRFS has its advantages. 7. 불가능. This is not ZFS. ReiserFS is another filesystem common to linux systems, but with some ongoing codebase issues whereby it periodically tries to kill your wife. I used XFS until I managed to corrupt my partition table (my fault not XFS'). I am getting too many input/output errors with my 3TB HDD NTFS hard disk for main files. The benchmark results of three most common file systems under Linux environment were given in this paper.